$4450 and 4 hours to go, http://bit.ly/enNlWA
I think that's much to much!!
Printable View
$4450 and 4 hours to go, http://bit.ly/enNlWA
I think that's much to much!!
I guess those rusty corroded power amps are worth a lot!
Nothing special there for the Altec parts.
Ron
Looks like a Horrendous recone IMO look at the dustcap on the one woofer.It's a ported box.I think Altec recommends a sealed enclosure for the 411.But I guess that's always open for debate as usual. ;)
I noticed that too--which is why I emailed him asking who did the re-cone and what kit was used. The one woofer looks o.k., but the glue job (dust cap) on the other one is sloppy --looks like it was done by a second grader in art class. Either that, or when he glued the better looking one, he wasn't using the glue in a well ventilated area and by the time he got to the second one he was seeing stars!
The seller should be celebrating today--these things sold for 5050 which are also the odds that the re-cone (and rusty amps) sounds good. Still, a cool rarity and I have to admit I'd love to hear how the 411's sound in those cabs with the 802's.....
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...%252B8Z4o%253D
AFAIK, there has been no "correct" cone available for 411 for a very long time.Quote:
which is why I emailed him asking who did the re-cone and what kit was used.
The sloppy glue job from the "re-foaming" is obvious on both woofers.
My wager is that those are very much original 411 cones, and after the first re-foam attempt they ended up with a rubbing VC. The hacked up dustcap is likely the result of having to shim the former for the subsequent re-foaming attempt.
No speaker tech worth his salt would allow a re-cone job looking like that to leave his shop, i thought this would be obvious to the folks on this forum.
The thought occurred to me that they may have been just been re-foamed and not re-coned but the seller listed in his ad (and also in his reply to my email) that they were re-coned. I guess I shouldn't be surprised that a seller doesn't know the difference between a re-cone and a re-foam as I've emailed sellers many times to let them know they've listed inaccurate info in their ads/to give them the correct info. They do look like original 411 style cones--I had no idea that GPA didn't offer recone kits for 411's--I've never owned any 411's. Unless the repair facility used NOS 411 cones for the re-cone (which I highly doubt), it seems very likely that my first notion was correct--that these were re-foamed and not re-coned. Either way, you can clearly see the sloppy workmanship in the photos.....
The good news is that I have a better pair than those that sold and It would be easy to put an amp in each one, should I care to do so.
[QUOTE=bowtie427ss;1860697No speaker tech worth his salt would allow a re-cone job looking like that to leave his shop, i thought this would be obvious to the folks on this forum.[/QUOTE]
As is my opinion why they are for sale. Only Bill can bring these Babies back to glory IMO. ;) I have a pair of 411's that Bill reconed and they look like Night & Day difference.:)
Bill reconed mine as well, and the cones look like the stockers to me.
Ron